CWP-3743- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (285) Sarvjot Singh State of Haryana CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, directing the respondents No.2 to 4, to perform their imperative corresponding duty to register an FIR, and investigate the No.5 to 7, in and 01.07.2021 (Annexures P Officer, i.e. DSP, Yamuna Nagar 2. made in the instant petition has already been rendered infructuous, as the FIR has already cancellation report stands presente Illaqa Magistrate concerned. -2022 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sarvjot Singh Versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Radhika Pathania, Advocate for Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, directing the respondents No.2 to 4, to perform their imperative corresponding duty to register an FIR, and investigate the complaints against the respondents in pursuance to enquiry reports/recommendations dated 12.02.2021 and 01.07.2021 (Annexures P-2 and P-3), Officer, i.e. DSP, Yamuna Nagar-3 (respondent No.4). Learned counsel for the State, informs this Court, that the prayer made in the instant petition has already been rendered infructuous, as the FIR already been registered, and even after conclusion of the investigation, a cancellation report stands presented on dated 18.02.2023, before the learned Illaqa Magistrate concerned. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3743-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.04.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Radhika Pathania, Advocate for Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Haryana. Through the instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, directing the respondents No.2 to 4, to perform their imperative corresponding duty to complaints against the respondents to enquiry reports/recommendations dated 12.02.2021 3), submitted by a Senior Police 3 (respondent No.4). ned counsel for the State, informs this Court, that the prayer made in the instant petition has already been rendered infructuous, as the FIR even after conclusion of the investigation, a d on dated 18.02.2023, before the learned Through the instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, directing the respondents No.2 to 4, to perform their imperative corresponding duty to complaints against the respondents to enquiry reports/recommendations dated 12.02.2021 submitted by a Senior Police ned counsel for the State, informs this Court, that the prayer made in the instant petition has already been rendered infructuous, as the FIR even after conclusion of the investigation, a d on dated 18.02.2023, before the learned MANPREET SINGH 2025.04.08 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-3743- 3. writ petition, has been rendered infructuous. 4. been rendered infructuous. 5. accordingly. 6. investigation concerned, for redressal of his grievance, if any. 7. April 07, 2025 Manpreet -2022 (O&M) In view of the supervening event, the prayer made in the instant writ petition, has been rendered infructuous. Consequently, the instant writ petition is been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand accordingly. In case, the petitioner still has any grievance with regard to the investigation, he is at liberty to approach the learned Illaq concerned, for redressal of his grievance, if any. Ordered accordingly. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 In view of the supervening event, the prayer made in the instant writ petition, has been rendered infructuous. Consequently, the instant writ petition is disposed of, as havin Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of In case, the petitioner still has any grievance with regard to the approach the learned Illaqa Magistrate concerned, for redressal of his grievance, if any. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No In view of the supervening event, the prayer made in the instant disposed of, as having disposed of In case, the petitioner still has any grievance with regard to the a Magistrate MANPREET SINGH 2025.04.08 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment