Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19276 (AP)

Neelam Venkateswarlu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/17768/2020 · 2025-09-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010269392020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17768/2020 Between: 1. NEELAM VENKATESWARLU,, S/O. NEELAM RAMAIAH (LATE), AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 0CC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KONIKI VILLAGE, INKOLLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P.-523167. 2. GUDI RAMADEVI,, W/O GUDI RAGHAVA RAO, D/O NEELAM VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 0CC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O KONIKI VILLAGE, INKOLLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. - 523167. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE POLICE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, INKOLLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR, INKOLLU PS, INKOLLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. NEELAM KOTESWARA RAO, S/O NEELAM RAMAIAH (LATE), AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 0CC. CULTIVATION, R/O. H.NO.3-8, VINAYAKA TEMPLE STREET, KONIKI VILLAGE, INKOLLU MANDAL, 2 PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. - 523167 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MARRI VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. M KRISHNA CHAITANYA 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17768 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering in civil dispute between the petitioners and 5'h respondent pertaining to subject lands in S.No.503 and 504 of Koniki Village, lnkollu Mandal, Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and pass.…” 2. Heard Sri Marri Venkata Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the present petition is filed seeking a direction to the police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties and the petition may be disposed of. 5. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 02.09.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17768 of 2020 Dated.02.09.2025 UPS 172