HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8542 of 2025 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned AGA for the State- opposite party, and perused the material available on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 397 of 2024, under Sections 310(2), 317(3), 111(1) B.N.S., Police Station Arniya, District Bulandshahr. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the first information report and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused Digamber in the police custody. The said statement, insofar as it implicates the applicant, is unreliable. It is next contended that the applicant is not a member of any organized crime syndicate nor he acted on behalf of such syndicate. During the course of investigation the applicant was granted protection till the submission of police report by this Court vide order dated 03.03.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3983 of 2025, Ankul Kumar v. State of U.P. and others. Investigation has been completed. Charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant had cooperated in the investigation. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicant has been summoned by the court concerned. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. In case the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ahamad Farhan, Haya Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ankul .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant and, in particular, the facts that the applicant was not named in the first information report; the name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused Digamber in the police custody; during the course of investigation the applicant was granted protection till the submission of police report by this Court; investigation has been completed; the applicant had cooperated in the investigation and no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Ankul, involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available on each and every date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the concerned court. 7. Further, in default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. October 17, 2025 SKT/- NABAIL No. 8542 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad