Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192757 (ALL)

MUKESH KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/11615/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11615 of 2025 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the First Information Report dated 24.04.2025, giving rise to Case Crime No. 126 of 2025, under Section 420 I.P.C., Police Station Bisauli, District Budaun and further seeking a direction to the respondent-authorities not to arrest the petitioner pursuant to the impugned FIR. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record. 3. After some length of arguments, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State apprised the Court that the investigation has been completed and a charge-sheet has also been filed against the accused persons on 12.07.2025. In support of his contention, he has drawn the attention of the Court to the averments made in paragraph no. 8 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by the learned A.G.A. with liberty to the petitioner to avail other remedy available to him under the law. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that investigation has already been completed and a charge-sheet has also been filed, we do not find any good Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhinab Mishra, Ayush Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Sitaram Patel Mukesh Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication. 6. Accordingly, in view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail such other remedy available to him under the law, as advised. October 14, 2025 Brijesh Maurya CRLP No. 11615 of 2025 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad