Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192740 (ALL)

PUNEET MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15728/2025 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15728 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pawan Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Prasad, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the petitioner is the son of legally wedded wife of Shri Satya Prakash Mishra, who died in harness as Head Constable on 19.07.2024. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to accord compassionate appointment. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that whatever might be, it is for the writ petitioner to take a call and the writ petitioner may approach the third respondent, Commandant, 12th Battalion, PAC, District Fatehpur while filing a comprehensive representation along with the self-attested copy of the writ petition. 5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the third respondent, who shall on the receipt of the same by 07.11.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order after hearing the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nanda Kumar Shukla, Pawan Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Puneet Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) writ petitioner and the fourth respondent. 7. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 28, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15728 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad