1 2025:CGHC:20116 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3075 of 2025 1 - Shriram Tiwari S/o J. P. Tiwari Aged About 47 Years Presently Working As Daily Wages Employee ( Driver ), Public Health Department ( E/m), Division- Ambikapur District- Surguja ( C.G. ). 2 - Ganesh Prasad S/o Ghhedi Ram Aged About 43 Years Presently Working As Daily Wages Employee ( Driver ), Public Health Department ( E/m), Division- Ambikapur District- Surguja ( C.G. ). 3 - Suresh Das S/o Budhan Das Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Daily Wages Employee ( Helper ), Public Health Department ( E/m), Division- Ambikapur District- Surguja ( C.G. ). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.05.03 17:26:19 +0530 2 2 - The Engineer- In Chief Public Health Engineering Department, Tehsil And District- Raipur ( C.G.). 3 - The Chief Engineer Public Health Engineering Department Tehsil- Ambikapur District- Surguja ( C.G.). 4 - The Superintendent Engineer Public Health Engineering Department Ambikapur, District- Surguja ( C.G.). 5 - The Executive Engineering ( E/m), Public Health Engineering Department Ambikapur, District- Surguja ( C.G.). ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Aman Upadhyay, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 02.05.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are working as Daily Wagers in Public Health Department (E/m), Division Ambikapur District Sarguja preferred the present writ petition seeking a direction towards the respondent authority to consider their case for regularization pursuance to the circular dated 05.03.2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are working 2004, 2002 and 2008 respectively in the respondent department and the petitioners have submitted a representation 3 before the Executive Engineer/respondent no. 5 on 12.04.2025 and he submits that the writ petition be disposed of with a direction to the respondent for consideration of their claim of regularization in accordance with law under the current policy of the State Government. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent have no objection to the prayer made by the petitioner. 4. I have heard both the parties. 5. In view of the submission made by the petitioner and the respondents. As the petitioner has submitted a representation before the Executive Engineer vide (Annexure P/2) on 12.04.2025, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executive Engineer respondent no. 5 to consider the grievance and claim of the petitioner in accordance with law and the policy of regularization currently existing in the State. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib