HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD S.C.C. REVISION No. - 134 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. The application moved under Order VI Rule 17 CPC by the tenant/defendant/revisionist has been rejected, against which present revision under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Court Act, 1887 has been filed. 2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, I find that no case for interference is made out as amendment sought by the revisionist is with regard to the observations made by the trial court in its order summoning the records of Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar. 3. No case for interference is made out. Revision lacks merit and is hereby dismissed. October 14, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Abhishek Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Manish Tandon (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Heera Lal Sajnani .....Revisionist(s) Mohammad Rasheed .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad