RAYACHURI REDDI SARASWATHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/13949/2025 · 2025-06-15
Harinath N
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19270 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19270 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY. THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13949 OF 2025 Between; Rayachuri Reddi Saraswathi, W/o Rayachuri Venkateswarlu, 73Yrs, Occ Housewife, R/o H.No.2 1236/B, Padmavathi Nagar, Pileru Mandal, Pileru, Annamayya District, Andhra Pradesh 517 214. Aged ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department. Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Director General of Police, Office at District Police Office, Rayachoti, Annamayya District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Superintendent of Police. Annamayya District, Rayachoty, A.P.
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madanapalle.AnnamayyaDistrict,
5. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station Annamayya District, AP. 6. Venkataramana, S/o Subbarayudu, Aged 65 Yrs, Occ Not known, R/o Kummaraveedhi, Krishna Nagar, Madanapalle, Annamayya District And also C/o K.V.R. Tomato Mandi Agriculture Market Yard, Neerugattivaripalle, Madanapalle.Annamayya District, Andhra Madanapalle Pradesh. 7. Sankar Reddy, S/o Bayya Reddy, Aged 70 Yrs, Occ Not known, R/o Railway Colony, C.T.M. Madanapalle Mandal, Annamayya District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the illegal action of the Respondent No.4 and 5 in trying to evict the Petitioner from her Property and interfering in the civil disputes, in related to her property, an extent of Admeasuring Ac. 0-12 1/2 cents in Sy.No.521-1, situated at Bandameedakammapalle Village, Madanapalle Municipal Area, Madanapalle Sub-District, AnnamayyaDistrict, Andhra Pradesh and Summoning the Petitioners to the II Town Station Madanapalle and insisting for the settlement in Civil dispute and threatening the Petitioner to compromise with the Unofficial Respondents 6 and 7in related to the Petitioners property, which is illegal, arbitrary, and also violation of Article 21 and 300-A of Constitution Consequently, direct the Respondent Nos.5 not to harass the Petitioner Summoning the Petitioner to the II Town Police Station not to involve in civil cases with regarding to the Petitioner land.
lANaiOF2025 Police of India and by Madanapalle and Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.5 not to harass the Petitioner by Summoning the Petitioner to the II Town Police Station, Madanapalle and not to involve in civil cases with regarding to the Petitioner's Property pending disposal of the above writ petition. % Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. SUBRAMANYAM DARABOINA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order:
APHC010268382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13949/2025 Between: Rayachuri Reddi Saraswathi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SUBRAMANYAM DARABOINA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 and 7 have civil disputes pending between them, and that at the behest of respondent Nos.6 and 7, respondent No.5 is interfering with the civil dispute and trying to dispossess the petitioner. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the
2. respondent is not interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 & 7. Considering the same, this Court is inclined to dispose off the writ petition at the admission stage by directing the 5*^ respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent Nos.6 & 7 without
3. following the due process of law.
4. With these observations, this Writ Petition is disposed off. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sh^jlk^tand closed.
SD/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANr^GfSTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh.
2. The Director General of Police, Office at District Police Office, Rayachoti, Annamayya District, Andhra Pradesh.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Annamayya District,Rayachoty, A.P.
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madanapalle,AnnamayyaDistrict, AP.
5. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Madanapalle, Annamayya District, AP.
6. One CC to Sri. Subramanyam Daraboina Advocate [OPUC]
7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
8. Three CD Copies GSC
HIGH COURT DATED;16/06/2025
ORDER WP.No.13949 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS