OIC Ltd. Vs. Vrinda Devi & ors. CMPs No.32638 & 32644 of 2025 in FAO No.378 of 2007 07.01.2026 Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant. Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for the applicants/ respondents No.2 & 3. CMP No.32638 of 2025 The instant application under Order 32, Rule 12, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been filed on behalf of the applicant/respondent No.2, for discharging his natural guardian/mother Vrinda Devi, i.e. respondent No.1, as he has attained the age of majority. 2. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavit of the applicant/respondent No.2 as well as taking into consideration the fact that he has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from the copy of his Matriculation examination certificate, annexed with the application, the same is allowed and his natural guardian/mother Vrinda Devi, i.e. respondent No.1, is ordered to be discharged from his guardianship and the applicant/ respondent No.2 is permitted to pursue the case in his own capacity. 3. The application stands disposed of. CMP No.32644 of 2025 4. The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been maintained by the applicants/respondent No.2 & 3, namely, Ratik Kanwar & Vivek Kanwar, respectively, for release of the awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavits of applicants/ respondents No.2 and 3. 5. As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money to meet out their day-to-day expenses. Therefore, it is prayed that the awarded amount of compensation alongwith up- to-date interest be released in their favour, as per their respective shares. 6. No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of non- applicant/appellant and the learned vice counsel for the non- applicant/appellant has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 09.12.2015, passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. 7. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the applications, which are duly supported with affidavits of the applicants/respondents No.2 & 3, coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the entire awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest in favour of applicants/respondents No. 2 & 3, as per their respective shares in the total awarded amount of compensation, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, after proper verification and identification by remitting the same to their respective bank accounts, copies whereof have been annexed aolngwith the application as Annexure-R2/A. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge January 07, 2026 (V.Himalvi)