[2025:RJ-JP:21649] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7945/2025 1. Smt. Bharti Devi Mangnani W/ O Shri Manoj Kumar Mangnani, Aged About 65 Years, R/o P.no. 298, Keshav Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer. 2. Shri Manoj Kumar Mangnani S/o Shri Shankar Lal Mangnani, Aged About 67 Years, R/o P.no. 298, Keshav Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Smt. Triloki Devi Goyal W/o Late Shri Rameshwar Lal Ji Goyal, R/o P.no. 38, Rambhawani, Navgrih Colony, Pushkar Road, Jaipur. 2. M/s Munna Motors, Through Its Proprietor Smt. Triloki Devi Goyal W/o Late Shri Rameshwar Lal Ji Goyal Property Plot No. 2/amc No. 62/9, In Front Of Nimbark Kot, Khailand Market, P.r. Marg, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Tamoliya assisted by Mr. Sarthak Palaria JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 22/05/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Rent Tribunal, Ajmer to decide the eviction application No.93/2022 (57/2022) filed by the petitioners under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2001”) within a time frame. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are senior citizens of the age of 65 years & 67 years respectively and they have filed an application under Section 9 of [2025:RJ-JP:21649] (2 of 2) [CW-7945/2025] the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, in the year 2022, for eviction of the respondents. Counsel submits that the said application is lying pending for its adjudication, so appropriate directions be issued to the Tribunal to decide the said application expeditiously within a time frame. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 4. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, while deciding the Criminal Appeal No.3589/2023 has deprecated the practice of the Courts of issuing directions to the subordinate Courts to decide the matter in a timeline. 5. The aforesaid directions cannot be issued by this Court. But looking to the fact that the petitioners are senior citizens of the age of 65 years & 67 years respectively, it is expected from the Rent Tribunal to make all possible endeavours to decide the eviction application expeditiously. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/19