HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33869 of 2016 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner though Sri Kapil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. It is informed by learned counsel for the respondents that due to subsequent development, the persent petition has now become infructuous. 3. Since nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as default. October 17, 2025 saqlain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kailash Nath Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kapil Kumar Pandey, Virendra Singh (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) C/M Sri Devvani Pracharak Sanskrit Madhyamik Vidyalaya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad