HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 20172 of 2024 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard Mr. M.P.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Tarunesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite party No.2, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. In pursuance of the earlier order dated 24.06.2025,the parties were directed to appear before the Court below along with a certified copy of the order for getting the verification done. In compliance to it, the compromise verification report dated 22.07.2025, submitted by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Aligarh is on record. 3. The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to stay the entire proceedings arising out of Charge-sheet No. 137 of 2023 dated 23.03.2023 in Criminal Case No. 174 of 2023, Case Crime No. 113 of 2023 under Sections 452, 323, 354, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Akrabad, District Aligarh, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Aligarh. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant states that an order was passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 05.08.2025 directing the applicants to file the said compromise deed before the court concerned which was to be verified by the court concerned. In pursuance of the said order, the court concerned on 01.09.2025 verified the said compromise. Copy of the same is on record. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the opposite Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : M.P.S. Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Niraj Kumar, Tarunesh Kumar Srivastava Rup Kishor .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) party no.2. 5. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 6. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the proceedings, charge sheet as well as cognizance order as prayed for by the applicant(s). 7. The present application is allowed. 8. The entire proceedings, charge sheet as well as cognizance order of the aforesaid case are hereby quashed. October 29, 2025 NSC A482 No. 20172 of 2024 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- NARENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad