Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19260 (RAJ)

RAMBABU GOYAL S/O SHRI CHHIDDA RAM JI GOYAL v. SURENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI RAM DHAN CHOUBE

CW/8124/2025 · 2025-07-03

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24419] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8124/2025 Rambabu Goyal S/o Shri Chhidda Ram Ji Goyal, Aged About 70 Years, R/o A/303, Sky Terraces, Shipra Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302020 ----Petitioner Versus Surendra Kumar S/o Shri Ram Dhan Choube, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Flat No. 4/463 In Front Of Parvati Park, Sector- 4, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) Also At- Krishi Farm, Bayana Road, Bhusawar Road, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Naman Maheshwari JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/07/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Rent Tribunal No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan-I to decide the eviction application No.117/2023 filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2001”) within a time frame. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a senior citizen of the age of 70 years and he has filed an application under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, in the year 2023, for eviction of the respondent. Counsel submits that the said application is lying pending for its adjudication, therefore, appropriate directions be issued to the Tribunal to decide the said application expeditiously within a time frame. [2025:RJ-JP:24419] (2 of 2) [CW-8124/2025] 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 4. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, while deciding the Criminal Appeal No.3589/2023 has deprecated the practice of the Courts of issuing directions to the subordinate Courts to decide the matter in a timeline. 5. The aforesaid directions cannot be issued by this Court, but looking to the fact that the petitioner is a senior citizen of the age of 70 years, it is expected from the Rent Tribunal to make all possible endeavours to decide the eviction application expeditiously. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /29