HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35756 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is the owner of Gata No.337 area 8 decimal, and on some part of the land, petitioner has constructed hut and rest of the land is using for agricultural work. On the aforesaid land, respondent-authority has installed high tension electric wires which often sparks due to which, an untoward incidents may take place. The petitioner in this respect has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but no heed has been paid on the same. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioners. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, we dispose off the writ petition permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievance before the respondent no.2-Executive Engineer, Dakshinanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam, District Etah within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. October 14, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Binod Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Alok Mishra, C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Nem Singh .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad