HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33517 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Parvish Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 462 of 2025, under Sections 126(2), 131, 351, 352, 115(2), 109(1), 118(1) B.N.S., P.S. Baraut, District Baghpat. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that general allegation has been made in the F.I.R. against the applicant and co-accused that they hit the injured with the butt of fire arm, however, the injured in his statement has stated that he was hit by the accused with brick. It is further submitted that as per the injury report the injured received four injuries caused by hard and blunt object, therefore, the entire prosecution story is doubtful. It is further submitted that the applicant has explained his criminal history. The applicant is languishing in jail since 7.8.2025. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer and submitted that specific allegation has been made against applicant as well as co- accused for hitting the injured with a hard and blunt object on vital part which resulted into two injuries on the head, one injury on the left hand and another one on the right side of chest in which the injury on the left hand is grievous in nature. It is further submitted that the applicant has a criminal history 14 cases in which four cases are under Section 307 I.P.C., therefore, the applicant is a hard core criminal and he is not entitled to be released on Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lavkush Yadav, Parvish Kumar, Pooja Gond Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ajay Alias Goli .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) bail. 5. Considering the aforesaid submission and taking into account that allegation in the F.I.R. itself shows that the applicant along with co-accused threatened the injured to not to appear before the court below and his long criminal history shows that applicant is involved in repeated criminal activities in which the trial has been pending since 2018, therefore, just to prevent the applicant from committing further offence and also for ensuing trial of the pending cases without being influenced by the intimidation on the part of the applicant, this Court is not inclined to release the applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. October 13, 2025 Vandana BAIL No. 33517 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad