APHC010268552020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17711 OF 2020 Between: 1. SHAIK MADAR BASHA, S/o. Late Shaik Buden Sab, Aged about 59 Years, Occ. Tea Stall, R/o. 21/635 District, A.P. 1. THE STATE OF AP, Represented by its Principal Secr Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velgapudi, Amravathi, Andhra Pradesh 2. The District Collector, YSR (Kadapa) District 3. The Superintendent of Police, YSR (Kadapa) District Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents more particularly respondent No.2 in issuing the Order vide Ref.No.C1/08/M/2020, dated 29.02.2020 by directing the petitioner to remove himself outside the district for a period of 6 months is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently set aside the same and to pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 17711 OF 2020 1. SHAIK MADAR BASHA, S/o. Late Shaik Buden Sab, Aged about 59 Years, Occ. Tea Stall, R/o. 21/635-1, R K Nagar, Kadapa, YSR (Kadapa) ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Represented by its Principal Secretary Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velgapudi, Amravathi, Andhra Pradesh 2. The District Collector, YSR (Kadapa) District 3. The Superintendent of Police, YSR (Kadapa) District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents more particularly respondent No.2 in issuing the Order vide Ref.No.C1/08/M/2020, dated 29.02.2020 by directing the petitioner to remove himself outside the district for a period of 6 months is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of Principles d consequently set aside the same and to pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. SHAIK MADAR BASHA, S/o. Late Shaik Buden Sab, Aged about 59 1, R K Nagar, Kadapa, YSR (Kadapa) ...Petitioner etary Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velgapudi, Amravathi, Andhra Pradesh ...Respondents ndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents more particularly respondent No.2 in issuing the Order vide Ref.No.C1/08/M/2020, dated 29.02.2020 by directing the petitioner to remove himself outside the district for a period of 6 months is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of Principles d consequently set aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Order vide Ref.No.C1/08/M/2020, dated 29.02.2020 passed by the respondent No.2, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pasS Counsel for the Petitioner: SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17711 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents more particularly respondent No.2 in issuing the Order vide Ref.No.C1/08/M/2020, dated 29.02.2020 by directing the petitioner to remove himself outside the district for a period of 6 months is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently set aside the same and to pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Shaik Mohammed Ismail, learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of since the relief has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 21.08.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17711 of 2020 Dated.21.08.2025 KKV