NATTHU RAM AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/6216/2025 · 2025-03-03
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19255 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19255 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:29989 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6216 of 2025 Petitioner :- Natthu Ram And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dheeraj Singh (Bohra) Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief:
"(i) Issue a suitable Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 District Magistrate- Gautambuddh Nagar for mutation the name of petitioners in revenue records of Village- Ahmadpur Chauroli, Pargana & Tehsil Jewar, District- Gautambuddh Nagar in compliance of order dated 08.09.2021 passed by learned Board of Revenue Allahabad in Revision No. 23/2012- 2013 (Lallu and others Versus State of U.P. and others), under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. &L.R. Act. (ii) Issue suitable Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 District Magistrate Gautambuddh Nagar to consider the grievances of the petitioners deciding the latest representation of petitioners dated 29.10.2024 with reasoned and speaking orders."
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that even after an order was passed in favour of the petitioners by the Board of Revenue, the revenue entry is not corrected.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the petitioners can move an application for correction of revenue records before the appropriate Authority and the same may be directed to be decided in accordance with law.
5. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
6. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty
to the petitioners to move an appropriate correction application before the authority concerned under the provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. In case, such an application is moved by the petitioners, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of a certified copy of this
order after after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment.
Order Date :- 4.3.2025 S. Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad