Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192545 (ALL)

ROHIT KUMAR PATEL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

TACR/165/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 165 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Sri Sanjeev Kumar Khare, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Hausala Prasad, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Kunwar Tejandra Bahadur, learned AGA for the State are present. 2. The instant transfer application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to transfer the Case No. 1291 of 2024 (Smt. Shilpi Vs. Rohit), under Section 144 B.N.S.S., Police Station Airch, District Jhansi pending in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Jhansi to Principal Judge, Family Court, Jalaun. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant submits, applicant is husband of opposite party no.2 and he filed instant transfer application to transfer the case from District Jhansi to District Jalaun but now applicant is ready to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing and therefore instant application may be disposed off with the direction that if applicant filed an application before appropriate forum to appear through Video Conferencing then his application shall be entertained and he will be permitted to appear through Video Conferencing. 4. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for opposite party no.2 are having no objection. 5. The instant transfer application has been filed by the applicant, who is husband of opposite party no.2 to transfer the case from District Jhansi to District Jalaun but now he is ready to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing, therefore, instant transfer application is being disposed off with a direction that if applicant filed an application to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing then his application shall be considered and he Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Archana Chauhan, Sanjeev Kumar Khare Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Hausala Prasad Rohit Kumar Patel .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) will be permitted to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing. 6. Stay order, if any, shall stands vacated. October 14, 2025 AK Pandey TACR No. 165 of 2025 2 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad