[2025:RJ-JP:26472] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8464/2025 Chhuttan Meena S/o Shri Kanaram Meena, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Biwai, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, Dausa. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Bandikui, District Dausa 4. Tehsildar, Bandikui, District Dausa 5. Puran S/o Ranjeeta, R/o Village Babai, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa. 6. Banwari S/o Ramdhan, R/o Village Babai, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa. 7. Hariom S/o Ramdhan, R/o Village Babai, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/07/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “(i) By an appropriate writ, order of direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to remove the illegal encroachment from the Sawai Chak land (Gair Mumkin Bada) bearing Khasra No. 631 and public way situated in village Biwai(Bandikui) District Dausa. (ii) The respondents may further be directed to take legal action against the respondent No.5 to 7 who illegally encroached upon the aforesaid Sawai Chak land (Gair Mumkin Bada) & public way [2025:RJ-JP:26472] (2 of 3) [CW-8464/2025] (iii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be given in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking directions against the respondents for removal of encroachment from the subject land. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a physical inspection of the said land was conducted by the competent authority and encroachment of several persons were found on the same. Leaned counsel submits that, inspite of above, no action has been taken against the encroachers. Learned counsel submits that several applications/representations have been submitted to the respondents-authorities for doing the needful, but inspite of passing of considerable time, nothing has been done, hence, interference of this Court is warranted. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. This Court is not going into the controversy whether the subject land has been encroached or not. It is for the respondents-authorities to look into the matter. 6. Since the petitioner has already approached the authorities concerned for doing needful exercise, it is expected from the said authorities to proceed with the matter and act in accordance with law. 7. The petitioner is granted liberty to file one more representation before the respondents-authorities. In case, any such representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today, it is expected from the respondents- authorities concerned to decide the same after affording due [2025:RJ-JP:26472] (3 of 3) [CW-8464/2025] opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties in accordance with law, expeditiously as early as possible. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. 9. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order or direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular manner. They would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/47