31 NO BASHMARI SALABILA GAON PANCHAYAT AT SALABILA BAZAR AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
WP(C)/5509/2025 · 2025-09-23
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19254 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19254 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010207182025
2025:GAU-AS:13232
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5509/2025 31 NO BASHMARI SALABILA GAON PANCHAYAT AT SALABILA BAZAR AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, NAMELY ROFIQUL ISLAM, P.O.- SALABILA, P.S.- MANIKPUR, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM 2: ROFIQUL ISLAM PRESIDENT OF NO. 31 BASHMARI SALABILA GAON PANCHAYAT VILLAGE AND P.O - SALABILA P.S- MANIKPUR DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSAM. PIN -78339 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DIRECTOR IWT ULUBARI ASSAM GUWAHATI- 7.
3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER INLAND WATER TRANSPORT DIVISION ULUBARI GUWAHATI-7 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BONGAIGAON ZILLA PARISHAD BONGAIGAON ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SRIJANGRAM DEVELOPMENT BLOCK DIST - BONGAIGAON ASSAM.
6:JUHURUL HAQUE OPERATING AS A BOATMAN AND RUNNING THE SALABILA BHANDARA FERRY SERVICE (PARGHAT) P.O- SALABILA P.S- MANIKPUR DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-783392 7:NAZRUL HAQUE BOATMAN AND OPERATING THE NO. 5 BASHBARI BAZAR PARGHAT P.O.- SALABILA P.S.- MANIKPUR DIST- BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-78339 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. U. Mahmud, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. M. D. Borah, Standing Counsel : Ms. N. Borah, Standing Counsel
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 24.09.2025
Heard Mr. M. U. Mahmud, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Ms. M. D. Borah, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the IWT.
2. Taking into account that by the notification dated 09.07.2025 which was published in the Assam Gazette on 10.09.2025, the learned counsel
Page No.# 3/3 for the Petitioners submitted that the Petitioners herein would be well advised not to further press the instant writ petition.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. Liberty is given to the Petitioners to challenge the notification dated 09.07.2025, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant