Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192539 (ALL)

RANA PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.

ABAIL/1384/2020 · 2025-10-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1384 of 2020 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant. Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned Brief Holder for the State is present. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 691 of 2000, under Sections 109, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 408, 120B IPC and Section 13(1)(2) P.C. Act, Police Station Kotwali Mau, District Mau with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial. 3. The instant anticipatory bail application is pending since 31.01.2020 i.e. for last more than five and half years, therefore, it reflects, either applicant has lost the interest in the matter or by efflux of time, the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. 4. In view of above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed. 5. However, it is open for the applicant to file recall application if cause of action still survives. October 17, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Dubey, Krishna Nand Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sameer Jain,J.) Rana Pratap Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad