Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192521 (ALL)

KULDEEP YADAV URF AMIT YADAV v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/29184/2025 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29184 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant, today in the Court, which has been taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Lalji Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Roshan Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 87 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 109(1), 117(2), 351(3), 352 of B.N.S., P.S. Govind Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that in the F.I.R. as well as in the statement of injured, no allegation has been assigned to the applicant. It is further submitted that co-accused Hareesh Yadav has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Bail Application No. 12013 of 2025, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity with the co-accused. He is languishing in jail since 07.04.2025. Criminal history of only one case has been shown against the applicant in the supplementary affidavit. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the first informant and learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalji Yadav, Yashpal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kuldeep Yadav Urf Amit Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. p6. Let the applicant- Kuldeep Yadav urf Amit Yadav, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 13, 2025 Vibha Singh BAIL No. 29184 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad