[2025:RJ-JP:23230] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7979/2025 Dr. Pinku Khan Son Of Shri Nijam Khan, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Kurendha, Dholpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Through Its Principal Secretary. 2. Chairman, Neet Pg Admission/ Counseling Board-2024, S.m.s. Medical Education, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Principal, S.p. Medical College Rd, Pbm Hospital, Sardar Patel Colony, Bikaner, Rajasthan 334001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammad Shahid Hassan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanklap Vijay for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/06/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is posted at Dholpur as a Doctor. It is further submitted that on 22.04.2025 respondent issued a notification, inviting applications for 6 months Ultra Sound course under PCPNDT Act. It is also submitted that NEET PG-2024 exam was conducted on 11.08.2024 wherein petitioner marked appearance and secured a merit. Thereafter, rendering the petitioner eligible for PCPNDT course under the OBC NCL Category. 2. Additionally, it is submitted that petitioner was not having required certificate as prescribed with the specified period, so he [2025:RJ-JP:23230] (2 of 3) [CW-7979/2025] filed affidavit (Annexure-6) and subsequently procure the required certificate on 08.05.2025 (Annexure-7). It is submitted that as per the schedule, the last date of submitting the original documents was extended upto 19.05.2025, and the petitioner made his attempt but was bypassed, ignored and was not considered for the reasons beyond his control and best known to the petitioner. To show his bonafides, learned counsel has submitted that petitioner has approached the Court on 13.05.2025 i.e. well within the time frame. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that as on date, present petition is rendered infructuous, as the course in question has already started from the first week of June, 2025. 4. Howsoever, learned counsel is not able to refute the merit position and eligibility of the petitioner and the reasons that why on 19.05.2025, the candidature and plea of the petitioner was not considered. It is submitted that said is a factual averment and needs to be verified. 5. Having heard the contentions put-forth by the counsel representing both the parties and in the foregoing facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation (to be submitted along with a copy of this order and requisite documents) before the respondent No. 2/competent authority, who will decide the representation and the grievance of the petitioner within a period of 7 days upon filing. 6. It is made clear that petitioner will be at liberty to approach this Court if his grievance still survive even after the disposal of the representation. Nevertheless, if the petitioner is attaining the [2025:RJ-JP:23230] (3 of 3) [CW-7979/2025] requisite merit for the course in hand, no prejudice be caused irrespective of the commencement of the PNPNDT Course. 7. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /24