SMT. SUSHMA DEVI v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/36661/2025 · 2025-10-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192495 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192495 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36661 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Som Veer, learned counsel for petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent no. 1 and Sri Om Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that there are certain mistakes in the affidavit, therefore, petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh, which is not objected by counsels for parties.
3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 28, 2025 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Som Veer Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Om Prakash Mishra (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Smt. Sushma Devi .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad