HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4194 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Sole opposite party is present in the Court, who is identified by his counsel. 2. Exemption application supported by an affidavit has been filed today in the Court on behalf of sole opposite party through his counsel Ms. Tanisha J. Monir, which is taken on record. 3. Office is directed to proceed accordingly. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party states that the representation moved by the present applicant has been decided vide order dated 27.6.2025, in compliance of the order dated 21.5.2025 passed by this Court in Writ A No.7166 of 2025. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant, although admitted the order dated 27.6.2025 passed by the opposite party, but tried to challenge the legality and correctness of the order dated 27.6.2025. 6. In my considered opinion, the present applicant has an alternative remedy to challenge the aforesaid order before the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Shukla, Kartikeya Shankar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ramashankar .....Applicant(s) Sri Udai Singh Meena, Mandal Rail Prabandhak (D.R.M.) E.C.R. Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyay (Mugalsarai) .....Opposite Party(s) competent Court. 7. In this conspectus, as above, the contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 8. Presence of the opposite party is exempted. October 14, 2025 P.P. CAPL No. 4194 of 2025 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad