Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192433 (ALL)

PANKAJ KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/3962/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3962 of 2025 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is accused in Case No.1210 of 2020 (State Vs. Sufiyan @ Vyapari and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 84 of 2020, Under Section 401 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District-Jaunpur is pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur and no progress till now has been made in the said case. Learned counsel has further submitted that FIR in this case was lodged by police personal and all the witnesses also belong to police department. But till now despite process issued by learned Court, none of prosecution witnesses has appeared before the Court. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that a direction be issued to the court below to decide the said case as expeditiously as as possible. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, the court below concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, provided there is no legal impediment. 4. The application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. is disposed of accordingly. October 29, 2025 Mukesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Pankaj Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad