Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010206342025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3036/2025 ABDUL KAYUM S/O SAMSER ALI VILL- MERGANDA P.S. CHHAYGAON DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F HAQUE, MR A ISLAM,MR. S K M ALOMGIR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 25.09.2025
Heard Mr. F. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Barthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application has been filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the accused petitioner namely, Abdul
Page No.# 2/2 Kayum, has prayed for bail in connection with Barama P.S. Case No. 61/2025 under
Section
310(2)
of
BNS,
2023
added
Section 61(2)/140(2)/317(3)/310(5)/310(6)/111(2)(b)/111(3)/111(4) of BNS, 2023.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has been detained in custody since 13.08.2025.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary and submits that from the accused Khairul Hoque, 107 bags of stolen materials recovered and there are sufficient incriminating materials against the petitioner.
5. The voluminous case diary indicates progress in investigation, which however, is not yet completed. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor placed the case diary before the Court flagging the important and relevant portions. The investigation leads supports to the allegations about involvement of the present accused petitioner in the alleged offence. That apart, if some of the materials of the case diary are accepted they indicate involvement of the accused persons in an organized manner by way of vehicle hijacking on roads and highway and committing docoity thereof.
6. In said facts and circumstances and considering the serious nature of the allegation and the incriminating materials, it may not be appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, bail application stands rejected at this stage.
7. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant