HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 1174/2012 Meema Devi …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs State of J&K & Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER (22.04.2025) 01. The record reveals that the instant petition has come up before this Court after passing of the last order dated 18.05.2012, and during this intervening period, there was no effort on the part of the petitioner to get the instant petition listed. 02. Today also, when the instant petition was taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition even otherwise also Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Advocate appearing vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, learned AAG for the respondents submits that with the efflux of time the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution, alongwith connected application(s). 03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 22.04.2025 Bunty Serial No. 67 Bunty Kumar 2025.04.23 00:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document