Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1924 (BOM)

GAJANAN @ GAJA KASHIRAM REVATKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO, PS NARKHED DIST. NAGPUR

BA/1389/2025 · 2026-02-17

Shri M M Nerlikar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Order 170226ba1389.25 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL APPLICATION [BA] NO. 1389 OF 2025. Gajanan @ Gaja Kashiram Revatkar -VERSUS- State of Maharashtra and another. Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. Shri A. Khadse, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A.A. Madiwale, A.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1. CORAM : M.M. NERLIKAR, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 17, 2026. Heard. 2. The learned Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that though liberty was granted by this Court vide order dated 16.0.2025, to file application after 6 months, however, the applicant has directly approached this Court without approaching the trial Court. In this view of the matter, he seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to prefer the same before the trial Court by raising the ground of “delay in trial” and further requests that the Rgd. 2026:BHC-NAG:2796 Order 170226ba1389.25 2 trial Court be directed to expeditiously decide the said application. 3. Permission granted. Criminal Application is disposed of as withdraw with liberty as prayed for. The Trial Court is directed to expeditiously decide the bail application, if filed, by the applicant. JUDGE Rgd.