Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192398 (ALL)

AJAY MAURYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/34988/2025 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34988 of 2025 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Sri Brijesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ashwani Kumar Tripathi learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel are present. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners for a direction upon the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful living of the petitioners. 3. It is claimed that both petitioner nos.1 and 2 are major and they are living in Delhi where the petitioner no.1 works. Since his age is little short of being 21 years, they are living in live-in relationship. The parents of petitioner no.2 are the resident of Delhi. The petitioners have not impleaded any family member of petitioner no.1 and as per the present petition, they have danger and threat to their lives from the family members of the petitioner no.2. 4. However, on the other side, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel has raised a genuine question that if the petitioners are residing at Delhi and they have genuine apprehension of life from the family members of petitioner no.2, who also reside at Delhi, how they have any threat or danger to life in the State of U.P. 5. This situation makes this petition outside the jurisdiction of this case. There is no need to pass any order in this case and no interference is required in this matter. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 28, 2025 ss Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Ajay Maurya And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad