HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34590 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri K.K. Tiwari learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Badri Nath Dubey learned counsel holding brief of Sri Purnendu Kumar Singh learned counsel for the Union and Sri Arimardan Singh Rajpoot, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner in her individual capacity for the following relief: "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the District Magistrate Lalitpur to take action against Bank agents for not to harassment of petitioners for depositing the installment as is granted by the Bank. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case." 3. The petitioner has pressed for that relief on the strength of pleadings made in the writ petition. On query as to locus to maintain such writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to pleadings made in paragraph-14 of the writ petition. Those read as below: "That, it is also relevant to mention here that, the concern Bank has not initiated any proceeding except by making recovery through its recovery agents." 4. Neither the detail of any loan availed by the petitioner has been disclosed in the writ petition nor any details of the pleadings have been made to disclose what steps are being taken by any person to recover that Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kripa Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C. Leela Devi .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) loan or any amount being claimed under that loan, by any person. Leaving aside the issue of the identity of the persons who may allegedly be engaged in such an activity (of recovery), unless particulars of the loan availed and details of steps taken with reference to date and action performed is disclosed in the writ petition, the writ petition may continue to suffer from incurable defects. 5. Unfortunately, the defects have not been even offered to be cured during the course of hearing. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. October 13, 2025 Faraz WRIC No. 34590 of 2025 2 (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- FARAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad