- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20415 WP No. 39053 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 39053 OF 2018 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. NAGARAJ KHARVI, S/O RAMA KHARVI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT CAR STREET, UPPUNDA VILLAGE KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 227. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJ KHARVI, PETITIONER (ABSENT) VIDE ORDER DATED 16.11.2023) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KUNDAPURA DIVISION, KUNDAPURA - 576 229. 2. RANIBALE MEENU MARATA, PRATHIMIKA SAHAKARA SANGHA (N), UPPUNDA - 576 227, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 3. SRI. GOPAL KHARVI, S/O RAMA KHARVI, MAJOR, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20415 WP No. 39053 of 2018 R/AT CAR STREET, UPPUNDA VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 227. 4. SMT.SEETHU KHARVI W/O MADHAVA KHARVI MAJOR, R/AT CAR STREET, UPPUNDA VILLAGE KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 227. 5. SMT. KUSUMA W/O NAGARAJ KHARVI MAJOR, R/AT CAR STREET, UPPUNDA VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 227 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1; SRI. K.C. ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2; SRI. KIRAN R, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R4 - SEETHU KHARVI - SERVED; R5 - KUSUMA - SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM R-1 AND 2 WHICH ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN PASSING THE ORDER ANNEX-A DATED 27.7.2018 MADE IN CO- OPERATIVE APPEAL NO. 192/2016 BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU AND THE ORDER ANNEX-B DATED 28.6.2016 MADE IN CASE NO. 7/2016-17 BY R-1 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20415 WP No. 39053 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Court notice issued to the petitioner has been returned with an endorsement "unclaimed". 2. In view of the amendment made to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, if the notice is returned as "unclaimed", the same is deemed to be served. As such service of notice to the petitioner is deemed to have been complete. 3. Since, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner, it appears the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 4. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6