Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010206662025
2025:GAU-AS:13139
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3032/2025 ANARUL ISLAM S/O MOMIRUJ JAMAN RESIDENT OF VILL- KHODALDILA P.S. SOUTH SALMARA, DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N ALAM R K, MS M MALIK,MR. A RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
ORDER 22.09.2025
1. Heard Mr. N. Alam R K, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of regular bail to the accused/petitioner, namely, 1. Anarul Islam, who stated to have been arrested on 29.06.2025 in connection with South Salmara P.S. Case No. 67/2025, under Sections 61(2)/96/103 of the BNS, 2023.
3. The ejahar is dated 23.06.2025.
4. It is alleged that the informant’s minor daughter aged about 13 years 9 months was in a love relationship with the accused no.1 Anarul Islam – the present accused seeking bail. It is further alleged that on 05.06.2025 at noon while the family members were absent, the accused no.1 with instigation by the other two accused named in the FIR enticed the minor daughter to their residence where they tortured her physically and mentally and on 22.06.2025, the accused persons assaulted her daughter and killed her.
5. The case diary as called for has been received.
6. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State that based on the case diary, the investigation is yet not completed and the opinion regarding death is not final in the PM report. However, the FSL report is available and it rules out the
Page No.# 3/3 presence of ethyl alcohol in the viscera, thereby, indicating that it was not a case of consumption of poison.
7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused is in custody for 86 days. It is further submitted that in the statements of the witnesses recorded before the learned JMFC also, there are also such implications regarding the taking away of the girl and her subsequent death.
8. Considering the extreme serious nature of the allegations and the non-completion of investigation, despite its substantial progress, I deem it prudent to deny bail at this stage.
9. Accordingly, the bail petition stands rejected.
10. Return back the case diary.
11. With the above observations, this bail petition stands
disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant