IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 980 of 2024 Date of Decision: 01.03.2025 Sarjit Sarkar ... petitioner Versus State of H.P ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate vice Mr. Rahul Singh Verma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral) After arguing the matter for some time, learned vice counsel of the petitioner under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 1st March , 2025 (saurav pathania) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.