SMT. RAKHI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/33243/2025 · 2025-10-05
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192353 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192353 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33243 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State.
2. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.454 of 2023, under Sections 363/366/376 IPC and 5/6 POCSO, Police Station Soron, District Kasganj, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 6, 2025 Shaswat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Khalid Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Rakhi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad