- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1522 WP No. 56767 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 56767 OF 2017 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: M.M.KUSUGAL AGED 27 YEARS, OCC:SALVAGE BUYER, R/O GANESH PETE, P.B.ROAD, HUBALLI, DIST:DHARWAD-580 020. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N.P.SINGRI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. SHWETHA P.SHETTY AGED 34 YEARS, W/O LATE N.PRASHANTHA SHETTY, 2. MASTER PRADYOTH JAIN AGED 13 YEARS, S/O LATE N.PRASHANTHA SHETTY, SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN/NEXT FRIEND IS HIS MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1, SMT SHEWTHA.P.SHETTY, PERMANENTLY R/AT NADIBETTU GUTHU HOUSE, PADANGADY VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, DIST:MANGALORE-583 231. …RESPONDENTS (R1-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; R2-MINOR REPRESENTED BY R1) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1522 WP No. 56767 of 2017 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2017. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from eight years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 40