HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35538 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the District Magistrate Azamgarh, i.e. respondent no.2 to issue character certificate for contractor public or private sector, within specific period as fixed by this Hon'ble court. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the District Magistrate Azamgarh, i.e. respondent no.2 to direct the respondent no.2, District Magistrate, Azamgarh to decide the representation dated 18.9.2025 (Annexure No.3 to the writ petition) within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble court. (iii) Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. (iv) Award the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioner." 3. It is stated that the petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent No.2-District Magistrate, Azamgarh to consider his grievances but the respondent No.2 is not paying any heed to it. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kant Tripathi, Praveen Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Akhand Pratap Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent No.2-District Magistrate, Azamgarh within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same in view of the guidelines laid down by this Court in bunch of writ petitions leading of which is Writ-C No.718 of 2025 (Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. & Others) within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation. October 13, 2025 SS WRIC No. 35538 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad