CHANDRA BHUSHAN ALIAS JAI BHUSHAN v. STATE OF U.P.
BAIL/33825/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192269 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192269 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33825 of 2025 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Shri Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-Respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Chandra Bhushan @ Jai Bhushan, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 137 of 2025, under Sections 3/5A/5B/8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, Section 11 of Animal Cruelty (Prevention) Act, Police Station-Sakaldiha, District-Chandauli.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case crime number. The applicant is languishing in jail since 15.08.2024. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that neither the applicant was named in the First Information Report nor he has been arrested on the spot. His name has been surfaced in the statement of the co-accused. Learned counsel for the applicant submits the recovery shown from the alleged vehicle of 4 live progenies. Neither any beef nor any other incriminating material has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. There is no independent witness of the aforesaid recovery. Criminal history of four cases has been explained in paragraph no. 12 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chandra Bhushan Alias Jai Bhushan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
prayed for. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed, but could not dispute the aforesaid
facts. Considering all those facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima- facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Chandra Bhushan @ Jai Bhushan, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.
2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.
3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.
4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless their personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. October 14, 2025 Deepak/ BAIL No. 33825 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad