JAI SINGH AND 32 OTHERS v. STATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/10856/2020 · 2025-10-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192260 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192260 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10856 of 2020 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Case called out in the revised list. Although Sri Satya Prakash Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents is present, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated. October 16, 2025 Arun K. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Tiwari, Indrajeet Kumar, Pankaj Srivastava, Sudhanshu Pandey, Vineet Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Jai Singh And 32 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U P And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad