W.P.No.22144 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.02.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.22144 of 2010 L.Mohan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004. 3.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Cuddalore. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned orders passed by the first respondent herein in G.O.(2D).No.613 Home (Pol.V) Department dated 19.09.2007, and the order passed by the second respondent herein in R.C.No.60638/AP I(2)/2002 dated 29.05.2003 and the order passed by the third respondent herein in his proceedings P.R.185/H2/2002, u/r.3(a) dated 24.12.2002 and quash the same. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22144 of 2010 For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.G.Nanmaran Special Government Pleader ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order passed by the respondents, wherein, the punishment imposed earlier with stoppage of increment for one year without cumulative effect was modified to blackmark was dismissed by the first respondent vide order dated 19.09.2007. The petitioner is a Grade I Police Constable and was found absent on 04.11.2002. Therefore, a Charge Memo was issued to the petitioner on 11.11.2002 which culminated in a punishment order dated 24.12.2002 from the respondent. On further appeal before the second respondent, the punishment was modified to blackmark against which the petitioner filed a Revision petition before the first respondent which has culminated in the impugned order dated 19.09.2007 in G.O.(2D)No.613 Home (Pol.V) Department. The petitioner was aged about 44 years when the writ petition was filed. At this time, the petitioner would have retired from service on attaining the 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22144 of 2010 age of superannuation. The punishment that was awarded was already been reduced to blackmark. As such, there are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order rejecting the Revision filed by the petitioner before the first respondent. 2. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 03.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes/No jas 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22144 of 2010 To: 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004. 3.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Cuddalore. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22144 of 2010 C.SARAVANAN, J. jas W.P.No.22144 of 2010 03.02.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis