Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192220 (ALL)

KUMARPAL VERMA AND 2 OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/8426/2020 · 2025-10-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8426 of 2020 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed with prayer to direct respondent no.4- Superintendent of Post Office, Head Office, Budaun, to release the payment in respect of various accounts lying with the respondent no.4 alongwith the interest @ 12% from the date of maturity till the actual payment is made. 3. Shri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that since factual issue are involved in the present writ petition, the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable and in case the petitioners will represent before the respondent no.4, namely, Superintendent of Post Office, Head Office, Budaun, he will take decision and decide the matter expeditiously. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of finally permitting the petitioners to submit their separate representations before the respondent no.4 within a period of four weeks from today. If such representation be filed, the respondent no.4 is directed to decide the same strictly in accordance with law most expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nagendra Kumar Singh, Ramesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Sudarshan Singh, Vishnu Kumar Kumarpal Verma And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. It is made clear that the respondent no.4 after hearing the counsel for the petitioners and any other person, who is entitled for the aforesaid amount, will take decision in the matter strictly in accordance with law on merits of the case and in case it is found that petitioners are entitled for the amount pending with the respondent no.4, the same should be released in their favour forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition is disposed of. October 10, 2025 Anurag/- WRIC No. 8426 of 2020 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ANURAG JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad