Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192217 (ALL)

LAKSHMAN YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15426/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15426 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vikram Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, Sri Jai Singh Chandel, learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as Sri Akhilesh Kumar Maurya holding brief of Sri Siddharth Singhal for the Commission. 2. Grievance of the writ petitioner is that post serving the Army and being an Ex-service man, rendering 17 years of service, the writ petitioner applied in pursuance of an Advertisement no.8-Pariksha/ 2022 for recruitment on the post of Junior Assistant and post appearance in written examination, the final result was declared on 01.08.2025 but the writ petitioner has not been accorded appointment order, thus he could not assume charge. 3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to issue appointment order and permit the writ petitioner to join. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that there happens to be a criminal case pending against the writ petitioner, which might be a factor forestalling the claim of the writ petitioner for joining. However, according to him, the grievance of the writ petitioner is to be addressed at the first instance by the third respondent/ Director General, Medical Health Services Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow. He submits that the writ petitioner may approach the third respondent. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.3 by 31.10.2025, who on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikarm Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Siddharth Singhal Lakshman Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter. October 14, 2025 N.S.Rathour WRIA No. 15426 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad