Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 192215 (ALL)

SHIV KARAN SINGH (SINCE ISSUELESS DECEASED) AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/35790/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35790 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. On an oral prayer, counsel for the petitioners is permitted to correct the Prayer No.1, in the writ petition. Heard Sri Vijay Singh Gour, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent No. 2, the Commissioner, Kanpur Division, Kanpur Nagar, to decide an application dated 2.6.2025 for interim relief in Revision No. 1963 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C202503000001963), [Shiv Karan Singh Vs. Gaon Sabha], under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously and within a stipulated time period. A further prayer has been made for deciding the revision itself at an early date. Counsel for the petitioners has stated that the revision along with the application for interim relief was filed on 2.6.2025 and on 26.6.2025 an order was passed directing summoning of the records and fixing a date. It is submitted that the matter is pending since then and the delay in disposal of the aforesaid application for interim relief as well as the suit, is causing undue hardship to the petitioners. Accordingly, a prayer is made for a direction to the court/authority Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tinku Singh, Vijay Singh Gour Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh Shiv Karan Singh (Since Issueless Deceased) And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) concerned to conclude the proceedings of the aforenoted application for interim relief and that of the aforenoted revision, at an early date. Counsel for the State respondents has no objection to the proceedings being expedited, and also the early disposal of the application for interim relief. Having regard to the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the court/authority concerned would make an endeavor to conclude the proceedings of the case/revision expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months, and the application for interim relief, within one month; from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. October 14, 2025 Arun K. Singh WRIC No. 35790 of 2025 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad