IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 740 of 2025 Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Narotam Ram ……...Petitioner Versus M.Sudha Devi & Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma & Mr. Gaurav Chaudhary, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Since it is not in dispute that pursuant to mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, respondents have already passed consideration order, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of the judgment, alleged to have been violated. July 25, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge