APHC010220552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 12481/2025 Between: 1. SRI MADDILA PHANI, S/O. LATE KANAKA BIKSHAM, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. DO. NO. 5/27, NAVEEN MITTAL COLONY, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILAKALAPUDI POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. EDE KRISHNA, S/O LATE RAMU, AGED 42 YEARS, OCCWORKING AS TRAFFIC CONSTABLE, R/O. AVSS REDDY ROAD, BESIDES RAITHU BAZAR, PAYAKAPURAM VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRCIT WORKING ADDRESS, 5TH TOWN TRAFFIC POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent 2 SS, J W.P.No.12481 of 2025 not consider representation made by Petitioner to direct the 3rd Respondent to registering FIR inspite of the written complaint dt. 26.03.2025 19-04-2025 against unofficial respondent which he abused filthy language in the public inview of the grudged on me because I have filed a recovery of money case against unofficial respondent, when we attended the court for attending adjournment on 26-03-2024, illegal, arbitrary, against the Provisions of BNS Act and also against all settle principles of law and consequently direct the Respondents police to consider his representation by way of register an FIR against the unofficial Respondents based on the complaint dt. 19.04.2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents police to consider his representation by way of register an FIR against the unofficial Respondents based on the complaint dt. 19-04-2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 SS, J W.P.No.12481 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the concerned authority to register an FIR in pursuance of his written representations, dated 26.03.2025 & 19.04.2025. 2. It appears from the representation of the petitioner that the petitioner has alleged some allegations of criminal intimidation. However, it is admitted by the petitioner that the petitioner never approached the Police Authorities. 3. Considering the aspect, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the petitioner to approach the Police Station, if so advised, and ventilate his grievance or to register any crime, according to law. On such, the respondent No.3/ Station House Officer shall act upon the grievance of the petitioner, according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J 04.05.2026 MJA 4 SS, J W.P.No.12481 of 2025 77 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 12481/2025 04.05.2026 MJA