[2025:RJ-JP:35818] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7952/2020 Saroj D/o Ratiram W/o Satyapal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Bhungada, Tehsil Mundavar, District Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Savitri Wife Of Krishan Kumar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Mandan, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar. 2. Girna D/o Shri Ratiram Wife Of Ramotar, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Neemrana, District Alwar, At Present R/o Coginda, Tehsil Narnol, District Mahendragarh, Haryana. ----Respondents 3. Sub-Registrar/tehsildar, Madhan, Sub-Tehsil Madhan, Tehsil Madan, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Performa-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar with Ms. Priyanka Chauhan Ms. Nisha Jhaknariya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 08/09/2025 This present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a challenge to the order dated 02.01.2018 whereby, by ad- interim order the parties were directed to maintain status-quo as regards the suit property and so also the order dated 04.07.2018 whereby, interim order dated 02.01.2018 was extended. The petitioner has also prayed that the learned Court below be directed to decide the application of Temporary Injunction without any undue delay. After arguing the matter at some length, counsel for the petitioner has made a limited prayer that the learned Court below [2025:RJ-JP:35818] (2 of 3) [CW-7952/2020] be directed to decide the Temporary Injunction application at earliest. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and perused the material made available on record. The suit was filed in the year 2017 alongwith application of Temporary Injunction. As per the order-sheet dated 02.01.2018, ad-interim order was passed whereby, learned Court below had directed both the parties to maintain status-quo as regards the suit property and vide order dated 04.07.2018 the interim order was extended and the matter was fixed for arguments on Temporary Injunction application on 24.07.2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Temporary Injunction application is pending for last more than 7 years and has not been decided so far. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that Temporary Injunction application is pending for decision since 2017, this Court feels that ends of justice would meet if the learned Court below is directed to dispose of the Temporary Injunction application on merits at earliest. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge No.2, Behror to dispose of the Temporary Injunction application No.46/14/2017 at earliest and preferably within a period of two months from the date of submitting of the certified copy of this order. [2025:RJ-JP:35818] (3 of 3) [CW-7952/2020] Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /20