ANWAR ALIAS ANWARUL HUDA AND 4 ORS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/25456/2018 · 2025-10-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192151 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 192151 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25456 of 2018 Court No. - 85 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
1. Heard Shri Mahendra Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Mahendra Kumar Sharma, Advocate, holding brief of Shri Anand Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings, including charge-sheet No. 01/18 dated 26.03.2018, of Case No. 2506 of 2018 (State v. Anwar @ Anwarul Huda and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 2610 of 2017, under Sections 363, 366, 506, 120-B IPC, against applicant no.1 and Sections 363, 366, 504 IPC against applicant nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, P.S. - Dhanghata, District- Sant Kabir Nagar, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that in compliance of the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by this Court, the applicants filed compromise application before the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar and the concerned court vide it's order dated 26.09.2025 verified the said compromise in the presence of the applicants and opposite party no.2, verification report of the same is already on record. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate has submitted that since the parties have entered into compromise, which has also been verified by the trial court, therefore, no useful purpose would be served if the proceedings of the aforesaid case go on further. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, is also present. He has no Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mahendra Pratap Yadav, Pavan Kishore Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anand Kumar, G.A., Ravindra Prakash Srivastava Anwar Alias Anwarul Huda And 4 Ors .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
objection to the statement, made above. 6. In view of the above, it is deemed proper and meet the ends of justice that the proceeding of the aforementioned case be quashed. 7. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application stands allowed, keeping in view the compromise made by the applicants as well as opposite party no. 2.
The the entire proceedings, including charge-sheet No. 01/18 dated 26.03.2018, of Case No. 2506 of 2018 (State v. Anwar @ Anwarul Huda and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 2610 of 2017, under Sections 363, 366, 506, 120-B IPC, against applicant no.1 and Sections 363, 366, 504 IPC against applicant nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5, P.S. - Dhanghata, District- Sant Kabir Nagar, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar, is hereby quashed, so far as it relates to the present applicants. October 17, 2025 Rama Kant A482 No. 25456 of 2018 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad