Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29022 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. At the very outset, Sri Aman Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sandeep Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to failure of mediation, the prayer of the present case has become infructuous, therefore, same may be dismissed as infructuous, which is not objected by Sri Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Advocate and learned C.S.C. for the respondents.
2. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 14, 2025 ADY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Udayan Nandan (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Smt. Rekha Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad