- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1675 WP No. 5895 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 5895 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. ASGAR ALI KHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O. MR. YAKUB KHAN, R/O. KATTIGENAHALLI VILLAGE, JEDIGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT PIN - 562 114 2. MR. ABDUL RAWOOF KHAN, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, S/O LATE SATTAR KHAN R/O. KATTIGENAHALLI VILLAGE, JEDIGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TLAUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, PIN - 562 114. BOTH PETITIONERS SENIOR CITIZENSHIP ARE NOT CLAIMED …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M. SRINIVAS MURTHY, ADVOCATE (AB)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, MULTI-STOREYED BUILDINGS, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114 Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1675 WP No. 5895 of 2021 3. THE SATE BY THIRUMALASHETTI HALLI POLICE STATION, THIRUMALASHETTIHALLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114. REP. BY ITS SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1 & 3 V/O DT. 07/10/2021) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE CONCERNED RECORDS AND ISSUE APPROPRIATED WRIT. QUASH THE COMPLAINT DTD 23.12.2019 FILED BY THE R-2 BEFORE THE SUB-INSPECTOR THIRUMALASHETTI HALLI POLICE STATION AND FIR DTD 24.12.2019 IN CRIME NO.0147/2019 FILED BEFORE THE COURT OF JMFC HOSKOTE VIDE ANNX-F AND G. AND ETC., THIS W.P., COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation even though the matter is passed over twice and again called at 3.50 pm. The order sheet dated 24.09.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioners absent. No representation. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1675 WP No. 5895 of 2021 PF, Copies etc, to issue notice to respondent No.2 is not furnished, even though the petition is of the year 2021. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford one more opportunity finally a week's time is granted to do the needful." Inspite of that PF with correct address for issuance of notice to respondent No.2 is not furnished. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5