Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15144 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Shri Anoop Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Shri Prem Shankar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner belongs to Scheduled Caste category and he was accorded engagement as Seasonal Collection Amin on 22.06.2011 alongwith two others being Than Singh and Gandharv Singh and according to the writ petitioner, his collection was more than 75 percent, however, the writ petitioner was not engaged in the next session. So, the writ petitioner preferred Writ-A No. 59110 of 2012 which came to be disposed of on 08.11.2012 with a direction to decide the petitioner's representation and the same came to be rejected on 16.02.2023 on the ground that there was ban since 2001. Thereafter, on 27.11.2013, when the appointment of the writ petitioner was not being considered, he was constrained to file Writ Petition No. 3406 of 2014 which came to be disposed of for deciding the claim which came to be rejected on 28.02.2014. Against which, Writ-A No. 19720 of 2014 came to be preferred which was rejected on 12.02.2020. 3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction commanding the respondent no. 2, District Magistrate, Kasganj, for considering the claim of the writ petitioner for posting as Seasonal Collection Amin and to decide the representation of the writ petitioner dated 12.08.2025. 4. Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, submits that whatever Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jitendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
might be once the writ petition so noted above came to be dismissed then the chapter closes. 5. I have heard the submissions so made across the Bar and perused the record. 6. Apparently, the challenge so raised by the writ petitioner came to be rejected. Thus, no mandamus can be issued at this stage. 7. However, this writ petition stands disposed of leaving it open to the writ petitioner to apply in case any recruitment process is initiated by the respondents.
October 7, 2025 A. V. Singh WRIA No. 15144 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad